‘Another History’?

  • Gregory S. Kiselev
Keywords: transformations of anthropogenesis, “end of history”, progress, amoralism, philosophy of consciousness, probabilistic nature

Abstract

The author argues that due to human amorality and self-will, antihumanistic tendencies have begun to prevail in anthropogenesis. Looking at the present of humanity, there are more and more doubts about whether it is moving along the path of progress, an inevitable progressive movement towards higher forms of sociality and individuation. Hence, the problematic nature of the idea of the “end of history,” a probabilistic process. The immanent evil of the world not only cannot be overcome, but also seems to threaten its very physical existence. Complex problems facing humanity are being solved unsatisfactorily or not at all. Here we have the destruction of the biosphere, the threat of a global nuclear catastrophe, and the degradation of man himself as a spiritual being — the creator of culture. We can, perhaps, talk about signs of the deconstruction of humanity itself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gregory S. Kiselev

PhD in History, independent researcher.

Published
2025-06-16
How to Cite
KiselevG. S. (2025). ‘Another History’?. Philosophical Letters. Russian and European Dialogue, 8(2), 147-172. Retrieved from https://phillet.hse.ru/article/view/27316
Section
Russia and Europe: Paradoxes of Kinship